Advertisement

Dynamic Brain Imaging Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation Differential Frequencies DiFY SCS-PET clinical trial

Published:September 20, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.07.012

      Abstract

      Objectives

      This study with sequential 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT) scanning was designed to investigate any objective measurable effect of differential frequency stimulation (40 Hz, 4000 Hz, and 10,000 Hz) on specific pain matrix areas in patients who underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for intractable lumbar neuropathic pain.

      Materials and Methods

      In this single-center, randomized, blinded study, four brain 18F-FDG PET scans were performed for each patient—at baseline before SCS implant and after 40-Hz, 4000-Hz, and 10,000-Hz stimulation. After 40-Hz stimulation for four weeks, patients were randomized 1:1 (4000 Hz/10,000 Hz), crossing over at another four weeks. 18F-FDG PET-CT brain scans acquired on the GE-Discovery 710 PET system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) with 128-slice CT (250-MBq dose) were analyzed using the PMOD software (PMOD Technologies Ltd, Zurich, Switzerland). A total of 18 pain regions, the right and left prefrontal cortex (PFC), insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), hippocampus, amygdala, primary somatosensory cortices, secondary somatosensory cortices (SSCII), thalami, parabrachial, and periaqueductal gray (PAG), were analyzed.

      Results

      A total of 14 patients received 40 Hz for four weeks before crossing over to 10,000 Hz/4000 Hz. A total of 57 PET-CT scans (15 for baseline and 14 each for 40 Hz, 4000 Hz, and 10,000 Hz) were analyzed for maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), with a statistically significant difference in SUVmax between 40 Hz and baseline (p = 0.002) and 4000 Hz and baseline (p = 0.001) when pooled across 18 pain matrices. There was no statistical difference in SUVmax between 10,000 Hz and baseline. The pooled analysis showed a proportionately higher thalamic region reduction (59.5%) in metabolic activity than other pain matrices, PFC (52%), insula (50%), ACC (52%), SSCII (49%), and PAG (52%).

      Conclusion

      This large cohort of brain PET scans (n = 57) shows statistically significant differences in brain metabolic activity at 40 Hz and 4000 Hz from baseline, with effect on both nociceptive and affect-cognitive pathways (proportionately higher reduction in the thalamus), highlighting the possible mechanism of SCS.

      Clinical Trial Registration

      The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT03716557.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nihashi T.
        • Shiraishi S.
        • Kato K.
        • et al.
        The response of brain with chronic pain during spinal cord stimulation, using FDG-PET.
        Int Congr S. 2004; 1270: 315-319
        • Sufianov A.A.
        • Shapkin A.G.
        • Sufianova G.Z.
        • et al.
        Functional and metabolic changes in the brain in neuropathic pain syndrome against the background of chronic epidural electrostimulation of the spinal cord.
        Bull Exp Biol Med. 2014; 157: 462-465
        • Yearwood T.
        • De Ridder D.
        • Yoo H.B.
        • et al.
        Comparison of neural activity in chronic pain patients during tonic and burst spinal cord stimulation using fluorodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography.
        Neuromodulation. 2020; 23: 56-63
        • Melzack R.
        From the gate to the neuromatrix.
        Pain. 1999; Suppl 6: S121-S126
        • Lee M.C.
        • Mouraux A.
        • Iannetti G.D.
        Characterizing the cortical activity through which pain emerges from nociception.
        J Neurosci. 2009; 29: 7909-7916
        • Treede R.D.
        Transduction and transmission properties of primary nociceptive afferents.
        Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 1999; 85: 205-211
        • Barolat G.
        Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management.
        Arch Med Res. 2000; 31: 258-262
        • Kumar K.
        • Taylor R.S.
        • Jacques L.
        • et al.
        Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.
        Pain. 2007; 132: 179-188
        • Kapural L.
        • Yu C.
        • Doust M.W.
        • et al.
        Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial.
        Anesthesiology. 2015; 123: 851-860
        • Kriek N.
        • Groeneweg J.G.
        • Stronks D.L.
        • De Ridder D.
        • Huygen F.J.P.M.
        Preferred frequencies and waveforms for spinal cord stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled crossover trial.
        Eur J Pain. 2017; 21: 507-519
        • Eddicks S.
        • Maier-Hauff K.
        • Schenk M.
        • Müller A.
        • Baumann G.
        • Theres H.
        Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the first placebo-controlled randomised study.
        Heart. 2007; 93: 585-590
        • Hautvast R.W.
        • DeJongste M.J.
        • Staal M.J.
        • van Gilst W.H.
        • Lie K.I.
        Spinal cord stimulation in chronic intractable angina pectoris: a randomized, controlled efficacy study.
        Am Heart J. 1998; 136: 1114-1120
        • Taylor R.S.
        Spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome and refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/failed back surgery syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006; 31: S13-S19
        • Ubbink D.T.
        • Vermeulen H.
        Spinal cord stimulation for non-reconstructable chronic critical leg ischaemia.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2: CD004001
        • Thomson S.J.
        • Tavakkolizadeh M.
        • Love-Jones S.
        • et al.
        Effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation: results of the PROCO randomized controlled trial.
        Neuromodulation. 2018; 21: 67-76
        • Paz-Solís J.
        • Thomson S.
        • Jain R.
        • Chen L.
        • Huertas I.
        • Doan Q.
        Exploration of high- and low-frequency options for subperception spinal cord stimulation using neural dosing parameter relationships: the HALO study.
        Neuromodulation. 2022; 25: 94-102
        • Bentley L.D.
        • Duarte R.V.
        • Furlong P.L.
        • Ashford R.L.
        • Raphael J.H.
        Brain activity modifications following spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: a systematic review.
        Eur J Pain. 2016; 20: 499-511
        • Apkarian A.V.
        • Bushnell M.C.
        • Treede R.D.
        • Zubieta J.K.
        Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease.
        Eur J Pain. 2005; 9: 463-484
        • Sayed D.
        • Chakravarthy K.
        • Amirdelfan K.
        • et al.
        A comprehensive practice guideline for magnetic resonance imaging compatibility in implanted neuromodulation devices.
        Neuromodulation. 2020; 23: 893-911
        • Wehrl H.F.
        • Hossain M.
        • Lankes K.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous PET-MRI reveals brain function in activated and resting state on metabolic, hemodynamic and multiple temporal scales.
        Nat Med. 2013; 19: 1184-1189
        • De Groote S.
        • De Jaeger M.
        • Van Schuerbeek P.
        • et al.
        Functional magnetic resonance imaging: cerebral function alterations in subthreshold and suprathreshold spinal cord stimulation.
        J Pain Res. 2018; 11: 2517-2526
        • Stančák A.
        • Kozák J.
        • Vrba I.
        • et al.
        Functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral activation during spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients.
        Eur J Pain. 2008; 12: 137-148
        • De Groote S.
        • Goudman L.
        • Peeters R.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging exploration of the human brain during 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: a resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
        Neuromodulation. 2020; 23: 46-55
        • De Groote S.
        • Goudman L.
        • Van Schuerbeek P.
        • et al.
        Effects of spinal cord stimulation on voxel-based brain morphometry in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2020; 131: 2578-2587
        • De Groote S.
        • Goudman L.
        • Linderoth B.
        • et al.
        A regions of interest voxel-based morphometry study of the human brain during high-frequency spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.
        Pain Pract. 2020; 20: 878-888
        • Goudman L.
        • De Groote S.
        • Linderoth B.
        • et al.
        Exploration of the supraspinal hypotheses about spinal cord stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation: a systematic review.
        J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 2766
        • Sankarasubramanian V.
        • Harte S.E.
        • Chiravuri S.
        • et al.
        Objective measures to characterize the physiological effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain: a literature review.
        Neuromodulation. 2019; 22: 127-148
        • Knudsen L.
        • Petersen G.L.
        • Nørskov K.N.
        • et al.
        Review of neuroimaging studies related to pain modulation.
        Scand J Pain. 2018; 2: 108-120
        • Kishima H.
        • Saitoh Y.
        • Oshino S.
        • et al.
        Modulation of neuronal activity after spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain; H(2)15O PET study.
        Neuroimage. 2010; 49: 2564-2569
        • Nagamachi S.
        • Fujita S.
        • Nishii R.
        • et al.
        Alteration of regional cerebral blood flow in patients with chronic pain—evaluation before and after epidural spinal cord stimulation.
        Ann Nucl Med. 2006; 20: 303-310
        • Doot R.K.
        • Scheuermann J.S.
        • Christian P.E.
        • Karp J.S.
        • Kinahan P.E.
        Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.
        Med Phys. 2010; 37: 6035-6046
        • Kinahan P.E.
        • Fletcher J.W.
        Positron emission tomography-computed tomography standardized uptake values in clinical practice and assessing response to therapy.
        Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010; 31: 496-505
        • Buonocore M.
        • Bodini A.
        • Demartini L.
        • Bonezzi C.
        Inhibition of somatosensory evoked potentials during spinal cord stimulation and its possible role in the comprehension of antalgic mechanisms of neurostimulation for neuropathic pain.
        Minerva Anestesiol. 2012; 78: 297-302
        • Casey K.L.
        • Morrow T.J.
        • Lorenz J.
        • Minoshima S.
        Temporal and spatial dynamics of human forebrain activity during heat pain: analysis by positron emission tomography.
        J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85: 951-959
        • Jones A.K.
        • Huneke N.T.
        • Lloyd D.M.
        • Brown C.A.
        • Watson A.
        Role of functional brain imaging in understanding rheumatic pain.
        Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2012; 14: 557-567
        • Mehta V.
        • Bouchareb Y.
        • Ramaswamy S.
        • Ahmad A.
        • Wodehouse T.
        • Haroon A.
        Metabolic imaging of pain matrix using 18 F fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for patients undergoing L2 dorsal root ganglion stimulation for low back pain.
        Neuromodulation. 2020; 23: 222-233
        • Wager T.D.
        • Rilling J.K.
        • Smith E.E.
        • et al.
        Placebo-induced changes in FMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain.
        Science. 2004; 303: 1162-1167
      1. PMOD software brochure. PMOD Technologies LLC. Accessed January 10, 2021.

      Comments