Advertisement

Evaluation of the Modulation Effects Evoked by Different Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Frequencies Along the Central Vagus Nerve Pathway in Migraine: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Published:October 25, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.459

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a promising treatment option for migraines. This study aims to investigate the modulation effects of different taVNS frequencies along the central vagus nerve pathway in migraineurs.

      Materials and methods

      Twenty-four migraineurs were recruited for a single-blind, crossover magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. The study consisted of two taVNS MRI scan sessions, in which either 1-Hz or 20-Hz taVNS was applied in a random order. Seed-based static and dynamic functional connectivity (FC) analyses were performed using two key nodes of the vagus nerve pathway, the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) and the locus coeruleus (LC).

      Results

      Static FC (sFC) analysis showed that 1) continuous 1-Hz taVNS resulted in an increase of NTS/LC–occipital cortex sFC and a decrease of NTS-thalamus sFC compared with the pre–1-Hz taVNS resting state, 2) continuous 20-Hz taVNS resulted in an increase of the LC–anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) sFC compared with the pre–20-Hz taVNS resting state, 3) 1-Hz taVNS produced a greater LC-precuneus and LC–inferior parietal cortex sFC than 20 Hz, and 4) 20-Hz taVNS increased LC-ACC and LC–super temporal gyrus/insula sFC in comparison with 1 Hz. Dynamic FC (dFC) analysis showed that compared with the pre-taVNS resting state, 1-Hz taVNS decreased NTS–postcentral gyrus dFC (less variability), 20-Hz taVNS decreased dFC of the LC–superior temporal gyrus and the LC–occipital cortex. Finally, a positive correlation was found between the subjects’ number of migraine attacks in the past four weeks and the NTS-thalamus sFC during pre-taVNS resting state.

      Conclusions

      1-Hz and 20-Hz taVNS may modulate the sFC and dFC of key nodes in the central vagus nerve pathway differently. Our findings highlight the importance of stimulation parameters (frequencies) in taVNS treatment.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lipton R.B.
        • Bigal M.E.
        Migraine: epidemiology, impact, and risk factors for progression.
        Headache. 2005; 45: S3-S13https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.4501001.x
        • Burch R.C.
        • Buse D.C.
        • Lipton R.B.
        Migraine: epidemiology, burden, and comorbidity.
        Neurol Clin. 2019; 37: 631-649
        • Breslau N.
        • Rasmussen B.K.
        The impact of migraine: epidemiology, risk factors, and co-morbidities.
        Neurology. 2001; 56: S4-S12
        • Straube A.
        • Ellrich J.
        • Eren O.
        • Blum B.
        • Ruscheweyh R.
        Treatment of chronic migraine with transcutaneous stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagal nerve (auricular t-VNS): a randomized, monocentric clinical trial.
        J Headache Pain. 2015; 16: 543https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-015-0543-3
        • Ailani J.
        • Burch R.C.
        • Robbins M.S.
        • Board of Directors of the American Headache Society
        The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice.
        Headache. 2021; 61: 1021-1039https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14153
        • Lendvai I.S.
        • Maier A.
        • Scheele D.
        • Hurlemann R.
        • Kinfe T.M.
        Spotlight on cervical vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of primary headache disorders: a review.
        J Pain Res. 2018; 11: 1613-1625https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129202
        • Redgrave J.
        • Day D.
        • Leung H.
        • et al.
        Safety and tolerability of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in humans; a systematic review.
        Brain Stimul. 2018; 11: 1225-1238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.010
        • Yap J.Y.Y.
        • Keatch C.
        • Lambert E.
        • Woods W.
        • Stoddart P.R.
        • Kameneva T.
        Critical review of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: challenges for translation to clinical practice.
        Front Neurosci. 2020; 14: 284https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00284
        • Cao J.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Li H.
        • et al.
        Different modulation effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on the functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray in patients with migraine.
        J Transl Med. 2021; 19: 354https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03024-9
        • Zhang Y.
        • Liu J.
        • Li H.
        • et al.
        Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation at 1 Hz modulates locus coeruleus activity and resting state functional connectivity in patients with migraine: an fMRI study.
        Neuroimage Clin. 2019; 24101971https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101971
        • Sclocco R.
        • Garcia R.G.
        • Kettner N.W.
        • et al.
        Stimulus frequency modulates brainstem response to respiratory-gated transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation.
        Brain Stimul. 2020; 13: 970-978https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.011
        • Bauer S.
        • Baier H.
        • Baumgartner C.
        • et al.
        Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) for treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial (cMPsE02).
        Brain Stimul. 2016; 9: 356-363
        • Yuan H.
        • Silberstein S.D.
        Vagus nerve and vagus nerve stimulation, a comprehensive review: part III.
        Headache. 2016; 56: 479-490
        • Kong J.
        • Fang J.
        • Park J.
        • Li S.
        • Rong P.
        Treating depression with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: state of the art and future perspectives.
        Front Psychiatry. 2018; 9: 20https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00020
        • Beekwilder J.P.
        • Beems T.
        Overview of the clinical applications of vagus nerve stimulation.
        J Clin Neurophysiol. 2010; 27: 130-138
        • Hachem L.D.
        • Wong S.M.
        • Ibrahim G.M.
        The vagus afferent network: emerging role in translational connectomics.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2018; 45: E2https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.6.FOCUS18216
        • Garcia R.G.
        • Lin R.L.
        • Lee J.
        • et al.
        Modulation of brainstem activity and connectivity by respiratory-gated auricular vagal afferent nerve stimulation in migraine patients.
        Pain. 2017; 158: 1461-1472https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000930
        • Hutchison R.M.
        • Womelsdorf T.
        • Allen E.A.
        • et al.
        Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations.
        Neuroimage. 2013; 80: 360-378https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079
        • Kaiser R.H.
        • Whitfield-Gabrieli S.
        • Dillon D.G.
        • et al.
        Dynamic resting-state functional connectivity in major depression.
        Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016; 41: 1822-1830https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.352
        • Tu Y.
        • Fu Z.
        • Zeng F.
        • et al.
        Abnormal thalamocortical network dynamics in migraine.
        Neurology. 2019; 92: e2706-e2716https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007607
        • Tu Y.
        • Fu Z.
        • Mao C.
        • et al.
        Distinct thalamocortical network dynamics are associated with the pathophysiology of chronic low back pain.
        Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 3948https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17788-z
        • Chen J.
        • Sun D.
        • Shi Y.
        • et al.
        Alterations of static functional connectivity and dynamic functional connectivity in motor execution regions after stroke.
        Neurosci Lett. 2018; 686: 112-121
        • Zhou W.
        • Yuan Z.
        • Yingliang D.
        • Chaoyong X.
        • Ning Z.
        • Chun W.
        Differential patterns of dynamic functional connectivity variability in major depressive disorder treated with cognitive behavioral therapy.
        J Affect Disord. 2021; 291: 322-328https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.017
        • Ashburner J.
        A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm.
        Neuroimage. 2007; 38: 95-113https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007
        • Bär K.J.
        • de la Cruz F.
        • Schumann A.
        • et al.
        Functional connectivity and network analysis of midbrain and brainstem nuclei.
        Neuroimage. 2016; 134: 53-63
        • Priovoulos N.
        • Poser B.A.
        • Ivanov D.
        • Verhey F.R.J.
        • Jacobs H.I.L.
        In vivo imaging of the nucleus of the solitary tract with Magnetization Transfer at 7 Tesla.
        Neuroimage. 2019; 201116071https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116071
        • Coppola G.
        • Petolicchio B.
        • di Renzo A.
        • et al.
        Cerebral gray matter volume in patients with chronic migraine: correlations with clinical features.
        J Headache Pain. 2017; 18: 115https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-017-0825-z
        • Wei H.L.
        • Zhou X.
        • Chen Y.C.
        • et al.
        Impaired intrinsic functional connectivity between the thalamus and visual cortex in migraine without aura.
        J Headache Pain. 2019; 20: 116https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1065-1
        • Zhe X.
        • Gao J.
        • Chen L.
        • et al.
        Altered structure of the vestibular cortex in patients with vestibular migraine.
        Brain Behav. 2020; 10e01572https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1572
        • Brennan K.C.
        • Pietrobon D.
        A systems neuroscience approach to migraine.
        Neuron. 2018; 97: 1004-1021https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.029
        • Silberstein S.D.
        • Yuan H.
        • Najib U.
        • et al.
        Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for primary headache: a clinical update.
        Cephalalgia. 2020; 40: 1370-1384https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420941864
        • Messina R.
        • Rocca M.A.
        • Colombo B.
        • et al.
        Gray matter volume modifications in migraine: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.
        Neurology. 2018; 91: e280-e292
        • Younis S.
        • Hougaard A.
        • Noseda R.
        • Ashina M.
        Current understanding of thalamic structure and function in migraine.
        Cephalalgia. 2019; 39: 1675-1682
        • Granziera C.
        • Daducci A.
        • Romascano D.
        • et al.
        Structural abnormalities in the thalamus of migraineurs with aura: a multiparametric study at 3 T.
        Hum Brain Mapp. 2014; 35: 1461-1468https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22266
        • Xue T.
        • Yuan K.
        • Cheng P.
        • et al.
        Alterations of regional spontaneous neuronal activity and corresponding brain circuit changes during resting state in migraine without aura.
        NMR Biomed. 2013; 26: 1051-1058https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.2917
        • Coppola G.
        • di Renzo A.
        • Tinelli E.
        • et al.
        Thalamo-cortical network activity between migraine attacks: insights from MRI-based microstructural and functional resting-state network correlation analysis.
        J Headache Pain. 2016; 17: 100https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0693-y
        • Wang T.
        • Zhan W.
        • Chen Q.
        • et al.
        Altered resting-state ascending/descending pathways associated with the posterior thalamus in migraine without aura.
        Neuroreport. 2016; 27: 257-263https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000529
        • Qin Z.X.
        • Su J.J.
        • He X.W.
        • et al.
        Altered resting-state functional connectivity between subregions in the thalamus and cortex in migraine without aura.
        Eur J Neurol. 2020; 27: 2233-2241https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14411
        • Li Z.
        • Lan L.
        • Zeng F.
        • et al.
        The altered right frontoparietal network functional connectivity in migraine and the modulation effect of treatment.
        Cephalalgia. 2017; 37: 161-176https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102416641665
        • Zhang J.
        • Su J.
        • Wang M.
        • et al.
        Increased default mode network connectivity and increased regional homogeneity in migraineurs without aura.
        J Headache Pain. 2016; 17: 98https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0692-z
        • Ma M.
        • Zhang J.
        • Chen N.
        • Guo J.
        • Zhang Y.
        • He L.
        Exploration of intrinsic brain activity in migraine with and without comorbid depression.
        J Headache Pain. 2018; 19: 48https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0876-9
        • Singh-Curry V.
        • Husain M.
        The functional role of the inferior parietal lobe in the dorsal and ventral stream dichotomy.
        Neuropsychologia. 2009; 47: 1434-1448https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.033
        • Schmitz N.
        • Arkink E.B.
        • Mulder M.
        • et al.
        Frontal lobe structure and executive function in migraine patients.
        Neurosci Lett. 2008; 440: 92-96https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.033
        • Coppola G.
        • Di Renzo A.
        • Tinelli E.
        • et al.
        Evidence for brain morphometric changes during the migraine cycle: a magnetic resonance-based morphometry study.
        Cephalalgia. 2015; 35: 783-791https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102414559732
        • Jia Z.
        • Yu S.
        Grey matter alterations in migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Neuroimage Clin. 2017; 14: 130-140https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.01.019
        • Li K.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Ning Y.
        • et al.
        The effects of acupuncture treatment on the right frontoparietal network in migraine without aura patients.
        J Headache Pain. 2015; 16: 518https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-015-0518-4
        • DaSilva A.F.M.
        • Granziera C.
        • Snyder J.
        • Hadjikhani N.
        Thickening in the somatosensory cortex of patients with migraine.
        Neurology. 2007; 69: 1990-1995https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000291618.32247.2d
      1. DiGuiseppi J, Tadi P. Neuroanatomy, Postcentral Gyrus. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls. Published online 2021.

        • Edes A.E.
        • McKie S.
        • Szabo E.
        • et al.
        Increased activation of the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex to citalopram challenge in migraine: an fMRI study.
        BMC Neurol. 2019; 19: 237https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1478-0
        • Matharu M.S.
        • Bartsch T.
        • Ward N.
        • Frackowiak R.S.J.
        • Weiner R.
        • Goadsby P.J.
        Central neuromodulation in chronic migraine patients with suboccipital stimulators: a PET study.
        Brain. 2004; 127: 220-230https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh022
        • Li Z.
        • Liu M.
        • Lan L.
        • et al.
        Altered periaqueductal gray resting state functional connectivity in migraine and the modulation effect of treatment.
        Sci Rep. 2016; 620298https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20298
        • Yu D.
        • Yuan K.
        • Zhao L.
        • et al.
        Regional homogeneity abnormalities in patients with interictal migraine without aura: a resting-state study.
        NMR Biomed. 2012; 25: 806-812
        • Mayberg H.S.
        • Brannan S.K.
        • Mahurin R.K.
        • et al.
        Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response.
        Neuroreport. 1997; 8: 1057-1061
        • Hunter A.M.
        • Korb A.S.
        • Cook I.A.
        • Leuchter A.F.
        Rostral anterior cingulate activity in major depressive disorder: state or trait marker of responsiveness to medication?.
        J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013; 25: 126-133
        • Tu Y.
        • Fang J.
        • Cao J.
        • et al.
        A distinct biomarker of continuous transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation treatment in major depressive disorder.
        Brain Stimul. 2018; 11: 501-508
        • Khalsa S.S.
        • Lapidus R.C.
        Can interoception improve the pragmatic search for biomarkers in psychiatry?.
        Front Psychiatry. 2016; 7: 121https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00121
        • Paciorek A.
        • Skora L.
        Vagus nerve stimulation as a gateway to interoception.
        Front Psychol. 2020; 11: 1659
        • Goadsby P.J.
        • Holland P.R.
        • Martins-Oliveira M.
        • Hoffmann J.
        • Schankin C.
        • Akerman S.
        Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing.
        Physiol Rev. 2017; 97: 553-622https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00034.2015
        • Lu C.
        • Yang T.
        • Zhao H.
        • et al.
        Insular cortex is critical for the perception, modulation, and chronification of pain.
        Neurosci Bull. 2016; 32: 191-201https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-016-0016-y
        • Bigler E.D.
        • Mortensen S.
        • Neeley E.S.
        • et al.
        Superior temporal gyrus, language function, and autism.
        Dev Neuropsychol. 2007; 31: 217-238
        • Valfrè W.
        • Rainero I.
        • Bergui M.
        • Pinessi L.
        Voxel-based morphometry reveals gray matter abnormalities in migraine.
        Headache. 2008; 48: 109-117https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00723.x
        • Rong P.
        • Liu J.
        • Wang L.
        • et al.
        Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on major depressive disorder: a nonrandomized controlled pilot study.
        J Affect Disord. 2016; 195: 172-179https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.031
        • Li S.
        • Rong P.
        • Wang Y.
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation vs citalopram for major depressive disorder: a randomized trial.
        Neuromodulation. 2022; 25: 450-460https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2021.10.021
        • Fang J.
        • Rong P.
        • Hong Y.
        • et al.
        Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation modulates default mode network in major depressive disorder.
        Biol Psychiatry. 2016; 79: 266-273https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.025
        • Wang Z.
        • Fang J.
        • Liu J.
        • et al.
        Frequency-dependent functional connectivity of the nucleus accumbens during continuous transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in major depressive disorder.
        J Psychiatr Res. 2018; 102: 123-131https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.12.018