Advertisement

Interphase Gaps in Symmetric Biphasic Pulses Reduce the Therapeutic Window in Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus–Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor

Published:November 17, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.09.012

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Symmetric biphasic pulses enlarge the therapeutic window in thalamic deep brain stimulation in patients with essential tremor. Adding an interphase gap to these symmetric biphasic pulses may further affect the therapeutic window.

      Materials and Methods

      Nine patients (16 hemispheres) were included in this study. Biphasic pulses (anodic phase first) with interphase gaps of 0, 10, 20, 50, and 100 μs were tested, in random order. The outcome parameters were the therapeutic threshold (TT) and side-effect threshold (SET), and thus also the therapeutic window (TW).

      Results

      Increasing interphase gaps lowered both SET and TT (linear mixed-effects model; p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Because SET decreased predominantly, increasing interphase gaps resulted in smaller TWs (linear mixed-effects model; p < 0.001).

      Discussion and Conclusions

      Introducing an interphase gap in a symmetric biphasic pulse may lead to less selectivity in fiber or neuronal activation. Our findings show that, in the context of anode-first biphasic pulses, the use of zero-interphase gaps results in the largest TW.

      Clinical Trial Registration

      The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT05177900.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Louis E.D.
        • Ferreira J.J.
        How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor.
        Mov Disord. 2010; 25: 534-541https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22838
        • Dallapiazza R.F.
        • Lee D.J.
        • De Vloo P.
        • et al.
        Outcomes from stereotactic surgery for essential tremor.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019; 90: 474-482https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-318240
        • Benabid A.L.
        • Pollak P.
        • Gervason C.
        • et al.
        Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus.
        Lancet. 1991; 337: 403-406https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)91175-T
        • Boogers A.
        • Peeters J.
        • Van Bogaert T.
        • et al.
        Anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses enlarge the therapeutic window in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.
        Brain Stimul. 2022; 15: 286-290https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.01.012
        • Schüpbach W.M.M.
        • Chabardes S.
        • Matthies C.
        • et al.
        Directional leads for deep brain stimulation: opportunities and challenges.
        Mov Disord. 2017; 32: 1371-1375https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27096
        • Merrill D.R.
        • Bikson M.
        • Jefferys J.G.R.
        Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.
        J Neurosci Methods. 2005; 141: 171-198https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020
        • Deprez M.
        • Luyck K.
        • Luyten L.
        • Tambuyzer T.
        • Nuttin B.
        • Mc Laughlin M.
        An evaluation of the effect of pulse-shape on grey and white matter stimulation in the rat brain.
        Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 752https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19023-0
        • van Wieringen A.
        • Carlyon R.P.
        • Laneau J.
        • Wouters J.
        Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear.
        Hear Res. 2005; 200: 73-86https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.006
        • Weitz A.C.
        • Behrend M.R.
        • Ahuja A.K.
        • et al.
        Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses.
        J Neural Eng. 2014; 11016007https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/1/016007
        • De Ridder D.
        • Vancamp T.
        • Falowski S.M.
        • Vanneste S.
        All bursts are equal, but some are more equal (to burst firing): burstDR stimulation versus Boston burst stimulation.
        Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020; 17: 289-295https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2020.1736560
        • Koss A.M.
        • Alterman R.L.
        • Tagliati M.
        • Shils J.L.
        Calculating total electrical energy delivered by deep brain stimulation systems.
        Ann Neurol. 2005; 58 ([author reply: 168–169]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20525): 168
        • Fasano A.
        • Helmich R.C.
        Tremor habituation to deep brain stimulation: underlying mechanisms and solutions.
        Mov Disord. 2019; 34: 1761-1773https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27821
        • Gorman P.H.
        • Mortimer J.T.
        The effect of stimulus parameters on the recruitment characteristics of direct nerve stimulation.
        IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1983; 30: 407-414https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1983.325041
        • Brocker D.T.
        • Grill W.M.
        Principles of electrical stimulation of neural tissue.
        Handb Clin Neurol. 2013; 116: 3-18https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00001-2
        • van den Honert C.
        • Mortimer J.T.
        The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic stimulating currents.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 1979; 7: 117-125
        • Fiechter M.
        • Nowacki A.
        • Oertel M.F.
        • et al.
        Deep brain stimulation for tremor: is there a common structure?.
        Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2017; 95: 243-250https://doi.org/10.1159/000478270
        • Anderson D.N.
        • Duffley G.
        • Vorwerk J.
        • Dorval A.D.
        • Butson C.R.
        Anodic stimulation misunderstood: preferential activation of fiber orientations with anodic waveforms in deep brain stimulation.
        J Neural Eng. 2019; 16016026https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aae590
        • Groppa S.
        • Herzog J.
        • Falk D.
        • Riedel C.
        • Deuschl G.
        • Volkmann J.
        Physiological and anatomical decomposition of subthalamic neurostimulation effects in essential tremor.
        Brain. 2014; 137: 109-121https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt304
        • Anderson C.J.
        • Anderson D.N.
        • Pulst S.M.
        • Butson C.R.
        • Dorval A.D.
        Neural selectivity, efficiency, and dose equivalence in deep brain stimulation through pulse width tuning and segmented electrodes.
        Brain Stimul. 2020; 13: 1040-1050https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.017
        • Ramirez-Zamora A.
        • Boggs H.
        • Pilitsis J.G.
        Reduction in DBS frequency improves balance difficulties after thalamic DBS for essential tremor.
        J Neurol Sci. 2016; 367: 122-127https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.06.001
        • Dembek T.A.
        • Reker P.
        • Visser-Vandewalle V.
        • et al.
        Directional DBS increases side-effect thresholds—a prospective, double-blind trial.
        Mov Disord. 2017; 32: 1380-1388https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27093
        • Bruno S.
        • Nikolov P.
        • Hartmann C.J.
        • et al.
        Directional deep brain stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate area for essential tremor increases therapeutic window.
        Neuromodulation. 2021; 24: 343-352https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13234
        • Moldovan A.S.
        • Hartmann C.J.
        • Trenado C.
        • et al.
        Less is more – pulse width dependent therapeutic window in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.
        Brain Stimul. 2018; 11: 1132-1139https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.019

      Comments

        References

          • Kuncel A.M.
          • Grill W.M.
          Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation.
          Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115: 2431-2441
          • Bogdan I.D.
          • van Laar T.
          • Oterdoom D.L.M.
          • et al.
          Optimal parameters of deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: a meta-analysis and novel programming strategy.
          J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 1855
          • Volkmann J.
          • Moro E.
          • Pahwa R.
          Basic algorithms for the programming of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease.
          Mov Disord. 2006; 21: S284-S289
          • Picillo M.
          • Lozano A.M.
          • Kou N.
          • et al.
          Programming deep brain stimulation for tremor and dystonia: the Toronto western hospital algorithms.
          Brain Stimul. 2016; 9: 438-452