Advertisement
Clinical Research|Articles in Press

The Association of Psychiatric Comorbidities With Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes Following Spinal Cord Stimulator Placement

Published:January 29, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.12.010

      Abstract

      Background

      Outcomes after spinal cord stimulator (SCS) placement are affected by psychologic comorbidities. It is part of routine practice to do psychologic assessments prior to SCS trials to assess for the presence of maladaptive behavioral patterns. However, few studies have sought to quantify the effect of psychiatric comorbidities on complications, reoperation, and readmission rates. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of psychiatric comorbidities with postprocedural outcomes after SCS implantation.

      Materials and Methods

      Inclusion criteria included SCS placement between 2015 and 2020 (percutaneous approach or an open laminectomy-based approach) using Healthcare Corporation of America National Database. Data on psychiatric comorbidities present at the time of SCS implantation surgery were collected. Outcomes of interest included complication rates (defined as lead migration, fracture, malfunction, battery failure, postoperative pain, infection, dural puncture, or neurological injury), reoperation rates (defined as either revision or explant [ie, removal]), and readmission rates within 30-day and 1-year time after SCS implantation. We measured the association between psychiatric comorbidities and outcomes using multivariable regression and reported odds ratio (OR) and respective 95% confidence intervals.

      Results

      A total of 12,751 cases were included. The most common psychiatric comorbidities were major depressive disorder (16.1%) and anxiety disorder (13.4%). In unadjusted univariate analysis, patients with any psychiatric comorbidity had heightened rates of any complication (27.1% vs 19.4%), infection (5.9% vs 1.9%), lead displacement (2.2% vs 1.3%), surgical pain (2.1% vs 1.2%), explant (14.7% vs 8.8%), and readmission rates at one year (54.2% vs 33.8%) (all p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, with each additional psychiatric comorbidity, a patient had increased odds of experiencing any complication (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.36–1.57, p < 0.001), requiring a reoperation (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.37–1.6, p < 0.001), and requiring readmission (OR = 1.7, 99% CI = 1.6–1.8, p < 0.001).

      Conclusions

      The presence of psychiatric comorbidities was found to be associated with postoperative complication rates, reoperation, and readmission rates after SCS placement. Furthermore, each consecutive increase in psychiatric comorbidity burden was associated with increased odds of complications, reoperation, and readmission. Future studies might consider examining the role of presurgical mental health screening (ie, patient selection, psychologic testing) and treatment in optimizing outcomes for patients with psychiatric comorbidities.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sparkes E.
        • Duarte R.V.
        • Mann S.
        • Lawrence T.R.
        • Raphael J.H.
        Analysis of psychological characteristics impacting spinal cord stimulation treatment outcomes: a prospective assessment.
        Pain Phys. 2015; 18: E369-E377
        • Dydyk A.M.
        • Conermann T.
        Chronic pain.
        in: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, 2022
        • Sullivan M.D.
        What do we owe patients with chronic pain?.
        Pain Med. 2019; 20: 878-881
        • Viswanath O.
        • Urits I.
        • Bouley E.
        • Peck J.M.
        • Thompson W.
        • Kaye A.D.
        Evolving spinal cord stimulation technologies and clinical implications in chronic pain management.
        Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019; 23: 39
        • Isagulyan E.
        • Slavin K.
        • Konovalov N.
        • et al.
        Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: technical advances.
        Korean J Pain. 2020; 33: 99-107
        • Ghosh P.E.
        • Gill J.S.
        • Simopoulos T.
        The evolving role of high-frequency spinal cord stimulation as salvage therapy in neurostimulation.
        Pain Pract. 2020; 20: 706-713
        • Fishman M.A.
        • Antony A.
        • Esposito M.
        • Deer T.
        • Levy R.
        The evolution of neuromodulation in the treatment of chronic pain: forward-looking perspectives.
        Pain Med. 2019; 20: S58-S68
        • Goel V.
        • Kumar V.
        • Patwardhan A.M.
        • et al.
        Procedure-related outcomes including readmission following spinal cord stimulator implant procedures: a retrospective cohort study.
        Anesth Analg. 2022; 134: 843-852
        • Hussain N.
        • Boulos R.
        • Malik T.M.
        • et al.
        Identifying predictors for early percutaneous spinal cord stimulator explant at one and two years: a retrospective database analysis.
        Neuromodulation. 2023; 26: 124-130
        • Celestin J.
        • Edwards R.R.
        • Jamison R.N.
        Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and literature synthesis.
        Pain Med. 2009; 10: 639-653
        • Campbell C.M.
        • Jamison R.N.
        • Edwards R.R.
        Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation.
        Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013; 17: 307
        • den Boer J.J.
        • Oostendorp R.A.B.
        • Beems T.
        • Munneke M.
        • Oerlemans M.
        • Evers A.W.M.
        A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery.
        Eur Spine J. 2006; 15: 527-536
        • Desai M.J.
        • Aschenbrener R.
        • Carrera E.J.
        • Thalla N.
        Spinal cord stimulation: a psychiatric perspective.
        Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2022; 33: 335-357
        • Bruns D.
        • Disorbio J.M.
        Assessment of biopsychosocial risk factors for medical treatment: a collaborative approach.
        J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2009; 16: 127-147
        • Stephens K.A.
        • Ward A.
        Patient selection for spinal cord stimulators: mental health perspective.
        Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014; 18: 398
        • Paroli M.
        • Bernini O.
        • De Carolis G.
        • et al.
        Are multidimensional pain inventory coping strategy profiles associated with long-term spinal cord stimulation effectiveness?.
        Pain Med. 2018; 19: 1023-1032
        • Olson K.A.
        • Bedder M.D.
        • Anderson V.C.
        • Burchiel K.J.
        • Villanueva M.R.
        Psychological variables associated with outcome of spinal cord stimulation trials.
        Neuromodulation. 1998; 1: 6-13
        • Wolter T.
        • Fauler I.
        • Kieselbach K.
        The impact of psychological factors on outcomes for spinal cord stimulation: an analysis with long-term follow-up.
        Pain Phys. 2013; 16: 265-275
        • Nawaz H.
        • Choudhry A.
        • Morse W.J.
        • Zarnowski O.
        • Patel H.
        • Amin H.
        Do admitted Covid-19-positive patients on anticoagulation therapy have a reduced hospital stay and disease severity?.
        Cureus. 2022; 14e23382
        • Hasan S.M.
        • Faluk M.
        • Abdelmaseih R.
        • et al.
        Incidence of acute ischemic stroke in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation who had anticoagulation interruption: a retrospective study.
        Cardiol Res. 2021; 12: 225-230
        • Huang K.T.
        • Hazzard M.A.
        • Babu R.
        • et al.
        Insurance disparities in the outcomes of spinal cord stimulation surgery.
        Neuromodulation. 2013; 16 ([discussion: 434–435]): 428-434
        • Bondoc M.
        • Hancu M.
        • DiMarzio M.
        • et al.
        Age as an independent predictor of adult spinal cord stimulation pain outcomes.
        Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2022; 100: 1-7
        • Marola O.
        • Cherala R.
        • Prusik J.
        • et al.
        BMI as a predictor of spinal cord stimulation success in chronic pain patients.
        Neuromodulation. 2017; 20: 269-273
        • Mekhail N.
        • Costandi S.
        • Saweris Y.
        • Armanyous S.
        • Chauhan G.
        Impact of biological sex on the outcomes of spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain.
        Pain Prac. 2022; 22: 432-439
        • Jones M.R.
        • Orhurhu V.
        • O’gara B.
        • et al.
        Racial and socioeconomic disparities in spinal cord stimulation among the Medicare population.
        Neuromodulation. 2021; 24: 434-440
        • Ovrom E.
        • Hagedorn J.M.
        • Bhandarkar A.
        • Bydon M.
        Racial disparities in the cost of inpatient spinal cord stimulator surgery among patients in the 2016-2018 national inpatient sample.
        J Clin Neurosci. 2022; 98: 189-193
        • Mekhail N.
        • Azer G.
        • Saweris Y.
        • Mehanny D.S.
        • Costandi S.
        • Mao G.
        The impact of tobacco cigarette smoking on spinal cord stimulation effectiveness in chronic spine-related pain patients.
        Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018; 43: 768-775
        • Blackburn A.Z.
        • Chang H.H.
        • DiSilvestro K.
        • et al.
        Spinal cord stimulation via percutaneous and open implantation: systematic review and meta-analysis examining complication rates.
        World Neurosurg. 2021; 154: 132-143.e1
        • Thomson S.
        • Huygen F.
        • Prangnell S.
        • et al.
        Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e-health tool.
        Eur J Pain. 2020; 24: 1169-1181
        • Mannion A.F.
        • Elfering A.
        Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.
        Eur Spine J. 2006; 15: S93-S108
        • Boersma K.
        • Linton S.J.
        Screening to identify patients at risk: profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention.
        Clin J Pain. 2005; 21 ([discussion: 69–72]): 38-43
        • Rubin D.I.
        Epidemiology and risk factors for spine pain.
        Neurol Clin. 2007; 25: 353-371
        • Tunks E.R.
        • Crook J.
        • Weir R.
        Epidemiology of chronic pain with psychological comorbidity: prevalence, risk, course, and prognosis.
        Can J Psychiatry. 2008; 53: 224-234
        • Block A.R.
        Presurgical Psychological Screening in Chronic Pain Syndromes: A Guide for the Behavioral Health Practitioner.
        1st ed. Psychology Press, 1996
        • Main C.J.
        • Spanswick C.C.
        Pain Management: An Interdisciplinary Approach.
        Churchill Livingstone, 2000
        • Savage S.R.
        Addiction in the treatment of pain: significance, recognition, and management.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 1993; 8: 265-278
        • Iles R.A.
        • Davidson M.
        • Taylor N.F.
        Psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.
        Occup Environ Med. 2008; 65: 507-517
        • Daubs M.D.
        • Patel A.A.
        • Willick S.E.
        • et al.
        Clinical impression versus standardized questionnaire: the spinal surgeon’s ability to assess psychological distress.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 2878-2883
        • Deer T.R.
        • Mekhail N.
        • Provenzano D.
        • et al.
        The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee.
        Neuromodulation. 2014; 17 ([discussion: 550]): 515-550
        • Sparkes E.
        • Raphael J.H.
        • Duarte R.V.
        • LeMarchand K.
        • Jackson C.
        • Ashford R.L.
        A systematic literature review of psychological characteristics as determinants of outcome for spinal cord stimulation therapy.
        Pain. 2010; 150: 284-289
        • Doleys D.M.
        Psychological factors in spinal cord stimulation therapy: brief review and discussion.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2006; 21: E1
        • Beltrutti D.
        • Lamberto A.
        • Barolat G.
        • et al.
        The psychological assessment of candidates for spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management.
        Pain Pract. 2004; 4: 204-221
        • Burton B.N.
        • Barboza J.
        • Angerstein A.
        • et al.
        The association of insurance status with non-routine hospital discharge after placement of spinal cord stimulators.
        J Clin Anesth. 2019; 57: 17-19
        • Moeller-Bertram T.
        • Keltner J.
        • Strigo I.A.
        Pain and post traumatic stress disorder - review of clinical and experimental evidence.
        Neuropharmacology. 2012; 62: 586-597
        • Racine M.
        Chronic pain and suicide risk: a comprehensive review.
        Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018; 87: 269-280
        • Morasco B.J.
        • Gritzner S.
        • Lewis L.
        • Oldham R.
        • Turk D.C.
        • Dobscha S.K.
        Systematic review of prevalence, correlates, and treatment outcomes for chronic non-cancer pain in patients with comorbid substance use disorder.
        Pain. 2011; 152: 488-497
        • Richard J.Y.
        • Hurley R.A.
        • Taber K.H.
        Fibromyalgia: centralized pain processing and neuroimaging.
        J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019; 31: A6-A187
        • Borchers A.T.
        • Gershwin M.E.
        Fibromyalgia: a critical and comprehensive review.
        Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2015; 49: 100-151

      Comments