Advertisement
Clinical Research|Articles in Press

Assessment of Health Care Costs and Total Baclofen Use Associated With Targeted Drug Delivery for Spasticity

      Abstract

      Background

      Chronic spasticity causes significant impairment and financial burden. Oral baclofen, the first-line therapy, can have intolerable, dose-dependent side effects. Targeted drug delivery (TDD) through intrathecal baclofen delivers smaller amounts of baclofen into the thecal sac via an implanted infusion system. However, the health care resource utilization of patients with spasticity receiving TDD has not been studied extensively.

      Materials and Methods

      Adult patients who received TDD for spasticity between 2009 and 2017 were identified using the IBM MarketScan® data bases. Patients’ use of oral baclofen and health care costs were examined at baseline (one year before implantation) and three years after implantation. A multivariable regression model using the generalized estimating equations method and a log link function was used to compare postimplantation costs with those at baseline.

      Results

      The study identified 771 patients with TDD for medication analysis and 576 for cost analysis. At baseline, the median costs were $39,326 (interquartile range [IQR]: $19,526–$80,679), which increased to $75,728 (IQR: $44,199–$122,676) in year 1, decreased to $27,160 (IQR: $11,896–$62,427) in year 2, and increased slightly to $28,008 (IQR: $11,771–$61,885) in year 3. In multivariable analysis, the cost was 47% higher than at baseline (cost ratio [CR] 1.47, 95% CI: 1.32–1.63) in year 1 but was 25% lower (CR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66–0.86) in year 2 and 32% lower (CR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59–0.79) in year 3. Before implant, 58% of patients took oral baclofen, which decreased to 24% by year 3. The median daily baclofen dose decreased from 61.8 mg (IQR: 40–86.4) before TDD to 32.8 mg (IQR: 30–65.7) three years later.

      Conclusions

      Our findings indicate that patients who undergo TDD use less oral baclofen, potentially reducing the risk of side effects. Although total health care costs increased immediately after TDD, most likely owing to device and implantation costs, they decreased below baseline after one year. The costs of TDD reach cost neutrality approximately three years after implant, indicating its potential for long-term cost savings.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Martin A.
        • Abogunrin S.
        • Kurth H.
        • Dinet J.
        Epidemiological, humanistic, and economic burden of illness of lower limb spasticity in adults: a systematic review.
        Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014; 10: 111-122
        • Chang E.
        • Ghosh N.
        • Yanni D.
        • Lee S.
        • Alexandru D.
        • Mozaffar T.
        A review of spasticity treatments: pharmacological and interventional approaches.
        Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 2013; 25: 11-22
        • Adams M.M.
        • Hicks A.L.
        Spasticity after spinal cord injury.
        Spinal Cord. 2005; 43: 577-586
        • Pin T.W.
        • McCartney L.
        • Lewis J.
        • Waugh M.C.
        Use of intrathecal baclofen therapy in ambulant children and adolescents with spasticity and dystonia of cerebral origin: a systematic review.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011; 53: 885-895
        • Ertzgaard P.
        • Campo C.
        • Calabrese A.
        Efficacy and safety of oral baclofen in the management of spasticity: a rationale for intrathecal baclofen.
        J Rehabil Med. 2017; 49: 193-203
        • Winter G.
        • Beni-Adani L.
        • Ben-Pazi H.
        Intrathecal baclofen therapy-practical approach: clinical benefits and complication management.
        J Child Neurol. 2018; 33: 734-741
        • de Lissovoy G.
        • Matza L.S.
        • Green H.
        • Werner M.
        • Edgar T.
        Cost-effectiveness of intrathecal baclofen therapy for the treatment of severe spasticity associated with cerebral palsy.
        J Child Neurol. 2007; 22: 49-59
        • Vidal J.
        • Slof J.
        • Serrano D.
        • Marqués T.
        • Kumru H.
        • Benito-Penalva J.
        Cost-effectiveness of intrathecal baclofen Therapy in severe refractory non-focal disabling spasticity: a Spanish Hospital perspective.
        Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017; 17: 67-76
        • Farrell R.
        • Summers M.
        • Doogan C.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the cognitive benefits of intrathecal baclofen pump implantation in people with intractable multiple sclerosis related spasticity.
        Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021; 50102831
        • Lubsch L.
        • Habersang R.
        • Haase M.
        • Luedtke S.
        Oral baclofen and clonidine for treatment of spasticity in children.
        J Child Neurol. 2006; 21: 1090-1092
        • Greene P.
        Baclofen in the treatment of dystonia.
        Clin Neuropharmacol. 1992; 15: 276-288
        • Thompson N.R.
        • Fan Y.
        • Dalton J.E.
        • et al.
        A new Elixhauser-based comorbidity summary measure to predict in-hospital mortality.
        Med Care. 2015; 53: 374-379
        • Elixhauser A.
        • Steiner C.
        • Harris D.R.
        • Coffey R.M.
        Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
        Med Care. 1998; 36: 8-27
        • van Walraven C.
        • Austin P.C.
        • Jennings A.
        • Quan H.
        • Forster A.J.
        A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.
        Med Care. 2009; 47: 626-633
        • Consumer Price Index. U.S
        Bureau of Labor Statistics.
        (Accessed January 17, 2023.)
        • Zubair A.S.
        • Raymond M.
        • Patwa H.S.
        Utility of intrathecal baclofen pump in primary lateral sclerosis.
        J Neurol Sci. 2021; 420117227
        • Hugenholtz H.
        • Nelson R.F.
        • Dehoux E.
        • Bickerton R.
        Intrathecal baclofen for intractable spinal spasticity--a double-blind cross-over comparison with placebo in 6 patients.
        Can J Neurol Sci. 1992; 19: 188-195
        • Penn R.D.
        • Savoy S.M.
        • Corcos D.
        • et al.
        Intrathecal baclofen for severe spinal spasticity.
        N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 1517-1521
        • Tunali Y.
        • Hanimoglu H.
        • Tanriverdi T.
        • Hanci L.
        • Hanci M.
        Intrathecal baclofen toxicity and deep coma in minutes.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2006; 29: 237-239
        • Coffey R.J.
        • Edgar T.S.
        • Francisco G.E.
        • et al.
        Abrupt withdrawal from intrathecal baclofen: recognition and management of a potentially life-threatening syndrome.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 735-741
        • Reeves R.K.
        • Stolp-Smith K.A.
        • Christopherson M.W.
        Hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with baclofen pump catheter failure.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 353-356
        • Farid R.
        Problem-solving in patients with targeted drug delivery systems.
        Mo Med. 2017; 114: 52-56
        • Boster A.L.
        • Adair R.L.
        • Gooch J.L.
        • et al.
        Best practices for intrathecal baclofen therapy: dosing and long-term management.
        Neuromodulation. 2016; 19: 623-631
        • Boster A.L.
        • Bennett S.E.
        • Bilsky G.S.
        • et al.
        Best practices for intrathecal baclofen therapy: screening test.
        Neuromodulation. 2016; 19: 616-622

      Comments