Advertisement

Erratum

        With regard to the article in the January 2023 issue, “Three-Year Durability of Restorative Neurostimulation Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction” (Neuromodulation 2023;26(1):98-108), the authors conducted an additional review of the statistical methods used to account for missing data and an error in the imputation model for repeated binary endpoints was discovered. This error affects the responder rate estimates with imputation for missing data (N = 204) reported in Table 1 and Figure 4. Every test reported as statistically significant remains statistically significant and p values remain unchanged. All other results, descriptions, and clinical interpretations are not affected and remain unchanged. See the following for the revised Table 1 (changes in bold) and Figure 4. The authors regret the error.
        Figure thumbnail fx1
        FigureResponder proportions at common clinical importance thresholds. a. ≥ 50% VAS reduction and residual VAS ≤ 2.5 cm. b. ≥ 20-point ODI reduction and composite of ≥ 50% VAS reduction and/or ≥ 20-point ODI reduction. Solid lines represent completed cases; dashed lines represent results with MI for missing data (N = 204).
        Table 1Outcomes Reported for Completers and All Participants With Stratified Imputation for Missing Data.
        AnalysisBaseline1 year2 years3 years
        Mean ± SDMean (SE) or % (n/N)

        (95% CI)
        For continuous outcomes, P < 0.0001 for two-sided t-test if the change from baseline differs from 0.
        Mean (SE) or % (n/N)

        (95% CI)
        For continuous outcomes, P < 0.0001 for two-sided t-test if the change from baseline differs from 0.
        Mean (SE) or % (n/N)

        (95% CI)
        For continuous outcomes, P < 0.0001 for two-sided t-test if the change from baseline differs from 0.
        N = 204N = 176N = 204N = 156N = 204N = 133N = 204
        LBP VAS (cm)7.3 ± 0.73.0 (0.2)3.3 (0.2)2.4 (0.2)3.1 (0.2)2.4 (0.2)3.2 (0.2)
         Change in VAS (cm)−4.3 (0.2)

        (−4.7, −3.9)
        −3.9 (0.2)

        (−4.3, −3.6)
        −4.8 (0.2)

        (−5.2, −4.5)
        −4.2 (0.2)

        (−4.6, −3.8)
        −4.9 (0.2)

        (−5.3, −4.5)
        −4.0 (0.2)

        (−4.4, −3.6)
         Change in VAS (%)−58.9 (2.6)

        (−64.1, −53.6)
        −54.2 (2.7)

        (−59.5, −49.0)
        −66.7 (2.6)

        (−71.7, −61.6)
        −58.0 (2.7)

        (−63.3, −52.7)
        −67.4 (2.6)

        (−73.1, −61.6)
        −55.6 (2.8)

        (−61.1, −50.1)
         ≥ 30% improvement in VAS73.9 (130/176)

        (67.4, 80.4)
        68.2 (3.4)

        (61.2, 74.4)
        82.6 (128/155)

        (76.6, 88.6)
        72.2 (3.3)

        (65.2, 78.2)
        82.3 (107/130)

        (75.7, 88.9)
        67.7 (3.6)

        (60.3, 74.3)
         ≥ 50% improvement in VAS63.6 (112/176)

        (56.5, 70.7)
        58.7 (3.6)

        (51.6, 65.5)
        71.6 (111/155)

        (64.5, 78.7)
        62.3 (3.6)

        (55.1, 69.0)
        76.9 (100/130)

        (69.7, 84.2)
        63.1 (3.7)

        (55.6, 70.0)
         ≥ 70% improvement in VAS46.6 (82/176)

        (39.2, 54.0)
        43.2 (3.6)

        (36.4, 50.3)
        61.9 (96/155)

        (54.3, 69.6)
        53.4 (3.7)

        (46.1, 60.5)
        61.5 (80/130)

        (53.2, 69.9)
        50.7 (3.8)

        (43.3, 58.1)
         LBP resolution (VAS ≤ 2.5 cm)51.7 (91/176)

        (44.3, 59.1)
        48.0 (3.6)

        (41.0, 55.0)
        66.5 (103/155)

        (59.0, 73.9)
        57.3 (3.6)

        (50.0, 64.2)
        66.9 (87/130)

        (58.8, 75.0)
        55.0 (3.8)

        (47.5, 62.3)
        ODI39.1 ± 10.319.0 (1.4)20.6 (1.0)17.6 (1.2)20.1 (1.1)16.4 (1.3)20.1 (1.1)
         Change in ODI−19.9 (1.2)

        (−22.3, −17.6)
        −18.4 (1.0)

        (−20.4, −16.3)
        −21.4 (1.3)

        (−24.0, −18.7)
        −18.9 (1.1)

        (−21.0, −16.8)
        −22.7 (1.3)

        (−25.3, −20.1)
        −18.9 (1.1)

        (−21.1, −16.8)
         Change in ODI (%)−50.5 (2.9)

        (−56.3, −44.8)
        −46.4 (2.8)

        (−51.8, −41.0)
        −54.3 (3.2)

        (−60.6, −48.0)
        −47.5 (2.8)

        (−53.0, −42.0)
        −58.5 (3.0)

        (−64.5, −52.6)
        −48.4 (2.9)

        (−54.0, −42.8)
         ≥ 20 points improvement in ODI57.4 (101/176)

        (50.1, 64.7)
        53.5 (3.6)

        (46.5, 60.5)
        61.3 (95/155)

        (53.6, 69.0)
        54.5 (3.6)

        (47.3, 61.5)
        62.6 (82/131)

        (54.3, 70.9)
        52.0 (3.7)

        (44.7, 59.3)
        Composite of VAS and ODI
         ≥ 50% improvement in VAS and/or ≥ 20 points ODI73.3 (129/176)

        (66.8, 79.8)
        67.9 (3.4)

        (60.9, 74.1)
        77.3 (119/154)

        (70.7, 83.9)
        67.7 (3.5)

        (60.5, 74.0)
        83.2 (109/131)

        (76.8, 89.6)
        68.7 (3.5)

        (61.4, 75.2)
         ≥ 50% improvement in VAS and ≥ 20 points ODI47.7 (84/176)

        (40.3, 55.1)
        44.1 (36)

        (37.3, 51.2)
        56.5 (87/154)

        (48.7, 64.3)
        49.4 (3.7)

        (42.3, 56.6)
        56.2 (73/130)

        (47.6, 64.7)
        46.2 (3.8)

        (38.9, 53.6)
        EQ-5D-5L index0.585 ± 0.1740.780 (0.012)0.763 (0.012)0.769 (0.012)0.768 (0.011)0.805 (0.014)0.764 (0.012)
         Change in EQ-5D-5L index0.198 (0.016)

        (0.167, 0.229)
        0.177 (0.011)

        (0.155, 0.199)
        0.218 (0.017)

        (0.184, 0.253)
        0.183 (0.011)

        (0.160, 0.205)
        0.220 (0.017)

        (0.186, 0.253)
        0.178 (0.012)

        (0.156, 0.201)
        PPR (%)65.7 (2.4)

        (60.9, 70.5)
        60.7 (2.5)

        (55.7, 65.7)
        72.1 (2.4)

        (67.3, 77.0)
        62.3 (2.6)

        (57.3, 67.3)
        75.3 (2.4)

        (70.6, 80.1)
        62.2 (2.6)

        (57.0, 67.3)
        SGIC “Better” or “Much better”71.6 (126/176)

        (64.9, 78.3)
        66.4 (3.4)

        (59.4, 72.8)
        78.6 (121/154)

        (72.1, 85.1)
        68.8 (3.4)

        (61.8, 75.1)
        80.0 (104/130)

        (73.1, 86.9)
        66.0 (3.6)

        (58.6, 72.7)
        TSQ “Definitely satisfied”78.2 (136/174)

        (72.0, 84.3)
        73.6 (3.2)

        (66.7, 79.4)
        80.0 (124/155)

        (73.7, 86.3)
        71.2 (3.4)

        (64.1, 77.3)
        85.5 (112/131)

        (80.4, 92.2)
        72.0 (3.4)

        (64.8, 78.2)
        CGI “Much better”73.3 (129/176)

        (66.8, 79.8)
        68.7 (3.4)

        (61.8, 74.9)
        77.6 (118/152)

        (71.7, 84.3)
        69.5 (3.4)

        (62.4, 75.8)
        81.4 (105/129)

        (74.7, 88.1)
        68.2 (3.6)

        (60.8, 74.8)
        Baseline carried forward for participants who withdrew because of lack of efficacy or explant because of infection. For remaining missing data, continuous outcome estimates from mixed model repeated measures regression models adjusted for baseline; all other binary outcomes analyzed with MI. Statistics are expressed as % (n/N) for binary outcomes and N, mean (standard error) for continuous outcomes.
        The imputation model estimates for years 1 and 2 also consider year 3 data and therefore differ slightly from those reported in earlier publications.
        For continuous outcomes, P < 0.0001 for two-sided t-test if the change from baseline differs from 0.

        Linked Article