Advertisement
Basic Research|Articles in Press

Pudendal Nerve Block by Adaptively Stepwise Increasing the Intensity of High-Frequency (10 kHz) Biphasic Stimulation

      Abstract

      Objective

      The purpose of this study is to determine whether adaptively stepwise increasing the intensity of a high-frequency (10 kHz) biphasic stimulation (HFBS) can produce nerve conduction block without generating a large initial response.

      Materials and Methods

      In anesthetized cats, three cuff electrodes were implanted on the left pudendal nerve for stimulation or block. The urethral pressure increase induced by pudendal nerve stimulation was used to measure the pudendal nerve block induced by HFBS.

      Results

      HFBS applied suddenly with a large step increase in intensity induced a large (86 ± 16 cmH2O) urethral pressure increase before it blocked pudendal nerve conduction. However, HFBS applied by adaptively stepwise increasing the intensity every 10 to 60 seconds over a long period (33–301 minutes; average 108 ± 35 minutes) with many small intensity increases (0.005–0.1 mA) induced no response or low-amplitude high-frequency urethral pressure changes before it blocked pudendal nerve conduction. The minimal HFBS intensities required by the two different methods to block pudendal nerve conduction are similar.

      Conclusion

      This study is important for better understanding the possible mechanisms underlying the HFBS-induced nerve block and provides the possibility of developing a new nerve block method for clinical applications in which an initial large response is a concern.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rosenblueth A.
        • Reboul J.
        The blocking and deblocking effects of alternating currents on nerve.
        Am J Physiol. 1939; 125: 251-264
        • Reboul J.
        • Rosenblueth A.
        The action of alternating currents upon the electrical excitability of nerve.
        Am J Physiol. 1939; 125: 205-215
        • Apovian C.M.
        • Shah S.N.
        • Wolfe B.M.
        • et al.
        Two-year outcomes of vagal nerve blocking (vBloc) for the treatment of obesity in the ReCharge trial.
        Obes Surg. 2017; 27: 169-176
        • Soin A.
        • Shah N.S.
        • Fang Z.P.
        High-frequency electrical nerve block for postamputation pain: a pilot study.
        Neuromodulation. 2015; 18 ([discussion: 205–206]): 197-205
        • Guo W.
        • Shapiro K.
        • Wang Z.
        • et al.
        Restoring both continence and micturition after chronic spinal cord injury by pudendal neuromodulation.
        Exp Neurol. 2021; 340113658
        • Gaunt R.A.
        • Prochazka A.
        Transcutaneously coupled, high-frequency electrical stimulation of the pudendal nerve blocks external urethral sphincter contractions.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 615-626
        • Miles J.D.
        • Kilgore K.L.
        • Bhadra N.
        • Lahowetz E.A.
        Effects of ramped amplitude waveforms on the onset response of high-frequency mammalian nerve block.
        J Neural Eng. 2007; 4: 390-398
        • Kapural L.
        • Yu C.
        • Doust M.W.
        • et al.
        Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 Therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial.
        Anesthesiology. 2015; 123: 851-860
        • Zhong Y.
        • Wang J.
        • Beckel J.
        • de Groat W.C.
        • Tai C.
        High-frequency stimulation induces axonal conduction block without generating initial action potentials.
        J Comput Neurosci. 2022; 50: 203-215
        • Wang Z.
        • Pace N.
        • Cai H.
        • et al.
        Poststimulation block of pudendal nerve conduction by high-frequency (kHz) biphasic stimulation in cats.
        Neuromodulation. 2020; 23: 747-753
        • Vallejo R.
        • Gupta A.
        • Cedeno D.L.
        • et al.
        Clinical effectiveness and mechanism of action of spinal cord stimulation for treating chronic low back and lower extremity pain: a systematic review.
        Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020; 24: 70
        • Williams J.M.
        • Kelley C.A.
        • Vallejo R.
        • Platt D.C.
        • Cedeño D.L.
        Animal pain models for spinal cord stimulation.
        in: Purevjav E. Pierre J.F. Lu L. Preclinical Animal Modeling in Medicine. IntechOpen, 2021: 197-223
        • Zhang X.
        • Roppolo J.R.
        • de Groat W.C.
        • Tai C.
        Mechanism of nerve conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical currents.
        IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006; 53: 2445-2454
        • Zhong Y.
        • Wang J.
        • Beckel J.
        • de Groat W.C.
        • Tai C.
        Mechanisms underlying poststimulation block induced by high-frequency biphasic stimulation.
        Neuromodulation. 2023; 26: 577-588https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13501
        • Vrabec T.L.
        • Eggers T.E.
        • Foldes E.L.
        • Ackermann D.M.
        • Kilgore K.L.
        • Bhadra N.
        Reduction of the onset response in kilohertz frequency alternating current nerve block with amplitude ramps from non-zero amplitudes.
        J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16: 80
        • Finch P.
        • Price L.
        • Drummond P.
        High-frequency (10 kHz) electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves for treating chronic pain: a double-blind trial of presence vs absence of stimulation.
        Neuromodulation. 2019; 22: 529-536

      Comment